Yeah, I know. I'm just saying, kinda, improving CJM d+3's damages to say, 12 (and prolly reduce the following hit by 5 damages to compensate it) would be better since we can't really hit confirm the following hit. Now and then people stop at the first hit for the fear of being blocked and punished, and end up doing poor damages. I mean, 7 damages, really? Even her standing 1 does more than that.

I've been using the translated notation from old ina wiki which I believe, was CJM 1K (which is CJM d/b+3, really). That's why I wrote it that way. And it works too.

Thanks.

One small news item for Tekken Tag 2 Anna - f+3,2 is a new B! attack.

Source: http://www.sunlightyellow.com/tekkentag2/

Translation by Babel Fish comes up with 'Sir val blow' . Make of that what you will.

I'll be making some updates to the list shortly. Thanks as always, Catkitty.

I'm back!! Because TTT2 is just within reach.

I hope this new B! of hers would give her the ability 'lengthen' her juggle a bit, and a wider hitbox on walls.

My pleasure Mr Bigglesworth and thanks for the update too!

Please don't hate me, I think I made a mistake:

While it is true that ina wiki mentioned that d/f+3, 1~b is -15, -3, -3, I should remind you that those are the exact same frames for d/f+3. What this means is that since d/f+3, 1~b is essentially d/f+3 with a movement cancel, it should take longer to recover (and simultaneously give out worse frames both hit and block) than a single d/f+3.

IIRC I posted way back that Ling's d/b+1 (i18) beats CJM 2, 1 (i10) coming from a hit d/f+3, 1~b. This convinces me that d/f+3, 1~b is at least -9f on hit.

------------

These right here might not be the most useful changes but:
T5 -> DR
u/f+1, 3: No longer knocks the foe down when connects at his / her back, allowing the following hits to connect

CJM Parry: Always deals 21 damages instead of taking the formula: 25 + (1/2 * base low damage)

TTT -> T5
Right and Back throw no longer guarantees d+3+4

d/f, d/f+1... allows the foe to recover faster

I noticed that you listed d/f+3, 3, 3, 1's new property as a negative change; while this is true, this could also be a beneficial change i.e, when it connects at the foe's back, where it guarantees a f,f+3; or near wall, where it's a free 3, 4 for clean damages (instead of scaled damages had it juggled).

-----------

Some more data from ina:

d/b+1... -7, +3, +3
d/b+1, 1... -17, -6, JG
d/b+1, 4... -17, JG, JG
d+1, N+4... -11, -1, -1 ---> Apparently it's negative frame on hit and CH now
d/b+2, N+4... -8, +1, +1
d/b+4... -18, -7, -7 ---> It is -14f on block in DR, but this one could be wrong
d/b+4, 3... -16, -2, JG

-----------
As for the new bound move, could it be translated as 'Serval Blow'? A serval is an African wild cat...

Thanks

Last edited by Catkitty on Mar 25th, 2011 at 07:56

What a weird-ass notation... I guess I'll have to see it for myself. Hopefully it has a better hitbox and better axis control than SS+3.

Also, the name is SA-BURU BURO-, or Serval Blow. It's referring to the Serval Cat in South Africa.

Okay, I've made some updates.

This is already listed in the 5.1 to DR section. Should it be in the 5.0 to 5.1?

I had no idea the reversal damage was formula based . I've put it in the list. I hope I've written the correct formula.

I'll admit I don't always trust INA. I'd be grateful if anyone could confirm these before I add them. I'm particularly interested in d/b+1's block recovery. I'm sure it improved to -1 in DR and INA never updated their frame data.

Poison frogs and African wild cats . Can anyone figure out what the theme is for Anna's move list?